June 25th, 2009 Outsourcing versus in-house
By Mike Wise, VP IdeaStar Insurance Technologies
Curious on your comments….
Let’s use a fictional example. Let’s say a niche agency, national, is expanding their lines to include some new products. The products have been market tested by a handful of agents and seem good to go. Now they want to recruit more agents and scale the new lines up. Thus the interest in a broker portal. Should we buy or build? Here’s a sample budget and timeline if outsourced to IdeaStar: $160k over about 12 months.
- Phase One: Portal design and architecture, laying the foundation. Recruited agents first complete a simple on-boarding process, an admin login facilitates the new-agent approval and continuing portal access. The admin can also manage sales and marketing materials.
- Phase Two: First product. Most revenue, biggest perceived market. Agent-driven Indication workflow, mapped PDF, data stored and accessible to both the agent and the H.O. admin. Off-line quoting by the H.O. (or online quote engine), upload to the portal for agent review and presentation. Binding Quote workflow, mapped PDF, data stored, etc. Renewal workflow.
- Phase Three: Second product, same functionalities modified to suit 2nd market.
- Phase Four: 3rd Product, same functionalities modified to suit 3rd market.
- Intentional Exclusions: Inbound and outbound data feeds, quote engines, state variations of mapped PDF’s.
So pretty straight forward in concept, but a LOT of work and a tremendous amount of potential portal development landmines every step of the way:
- design
- architecture
- usability
- functionality
- hosting
- security
- integration
- maintenance
- enhancements
- marketing…
Unknowns/Uncertainties/Risks:
- how many agents they will be able to recruit
- how many of those will adopt the portal
- and how well the product will sell.
If you do it in-house, perhaps you can test the waters at a lower cost, even understanding that this investment might be a throw-away if they then decide to outsource the full-blown portal. However, by building it in-house with little experience, and thus potentially a less than optimal agent experience in the pilot, they would be risking making a critical long-term business decision based on imperfect decision (something I have seen over and over in our business).
Based on either your personal experience, your industry observations, and/or your understanding of agent-driven insurance sales and marketing, any advise or guidance? Comment anonymously is fine, but it would be better if you’d give a little transparent background. Our industry desperately needs transparency.
Thanks for your input. GREATLY appreciated. Happy to answer follow-up questions.
Btw, I tweeted this article from Forresters yesterday. I think it’s not only relevant to this post, but it seems extremely relevant to the Life and Health insurance industry. I know a few CEO’s get it, but the vast majority don’t seem to.
Oh yeah, on a lighter note, my son was on ESPN again! Too funny. Daughter Kelle made the sign.

Oh, and the mission trips to Peru and the D.R. were fantastic…





All rights reserved.















